[icq-devel] New SRV_REPLYROSTER dumps
linuxmailinglists at kingant.net
Mon Jul 1 20:20:29 CEST 2002
Are you talking about the 2 byte flag in the SNAC header? I believe this
flag is set by the server, not the client. It is dependant on the version
for family 0x0013 that you sent to the server in the family 0x0001 subtype
0x0017 SNAC (and maybe another SNAC, I can't remember right now).
Sending version 1 for family x13 causes the SNAC flags to be 0x0000, and
there are no extra bytes at the beginning. I believe sending versions 2, 3,
or 4 will cause the flags to change, and you will have to parse the
SRV_REPLYROSTER packet differently. I do not know what has changed in the 4
revisions to this family. Gaim/libfaim sends version 1 with no problems.
> i> Hm...IMHO, old icq-clients (less v7) don`t work with ROSTER.
> i> or am I mistaking?
> Yes it's true! :) In the matter of fact, I'll try to create some
> lists in v7 icq to understand this strange behavior with the 15th
> byte :)
O O Mark Doliner
\ | kingant at kingant.net
\ | www.kingant.net
"I'd rather be rich than stupid."
More information about the icq-devel