fm.grattepain at wanadoo.fr
Tue Dec 3 22:50:07 CET 2002
Le samedi, 30 nov 2002, à 14:39 Europe/Paris, Rüdiger Kuhlmann a écrit :
> Well, there's still a (relatively long) timeout till the system gives
> Till then, everything is queued up. Which is why I suggested the
> timeout for
> receiving stuff, as the server usually sends a lot of status changes
> more or
> less continuosly. Unfortunately, it doesn't send keep-alives as well.
is it possible to reduce the timeout on a particular socket ?
More information about the icq-devel