[icq-devel] icqv7 notes



Barnaby Gray bgrg2 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Nov 14 10:44:28 CET 2001


No - licq is still the old protocol, even directly, I think it was
just having problems communicating with icq2001 clients directly over
this old protocol (they do still support it).

Barnaby

On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:58:14PM +1030, John Steele Scott wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Dirk Mueller wrote to the licq-devel list this morning to say that he'd 
> "fixed the direct communication problem with ICQ2001 clients." 
> 
> So it may be documented to some extent in the latest licq source code. I 
> haven't read the code, so I don't know. I do know that the parts of licq code 
> I have looked at don't tend to have much in the way of comments . . .
> 
> Toojays
> 
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:49, Massimo Melina wrote:
> > other than several new info, i tried to improve my doc for better
> > reading. as usual: icqv7.cjb.net
> >
> >
> > i'd like to know if someone is documenting direct-connections for
> > icq2000+
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Messages with missing or bad signatures may have been forged or modified in transit!
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAjvyDwYACgkQ0BW7kPcXjRUWeACgqtuvVi1O1zUAwZSNWYK8teR/
> r1sAoOGheb4taNAdhYsr89nUtSE3S3eV
> =Ss4x
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -------------------------------------------------
> icq-devel - The forum for ICQ protocol discussion
> For unsubscribe and other mailing list info, see:
> http://www.d.kth.se/~d95-mih/icq/icq-devel/
> 



More information about the icq-devel mailing list